Case 6001962/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Ionica v Luxury Leisure — 2024
- Case reference
- 6001962/2023
- Decision date
- 15 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson. Neither
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Ionica
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 6 February 2024, Employment Judge Adkinson listed a case management hearing. Neither party attended. The tribunal then issued orders indicating that consideration would be given to striking out the claim because it was not being actively pursued, and the parties were given until 14 February 2024 to object.
The respondent replied to the strike-out warning on 6 February 2024. The claimant did not respond to the warning, did not make representations as to why the claim should not be struck out, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim on the ground that it was not being actively pursued. The hearing fixed for 29 and 30 September 2025 and 1 October 2025 will not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim was struck out because it was not being actively pursued. A case management hearing listed on 6 February 2024 was not attended by either party, a strike-out warning was sent the same day, the respondent replied, and the claimant did not respond or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.