Case 6002003/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Angela Hughes v Link Academy Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 6002003/2023
- Decision date
- 26 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Volkmer Representation
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Angela Hughes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss Angela Hughes, brought complaints against Link Academy Trust heard at Exeter on 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 November 2024 before Employment Judge Volkmer. The written record records two disability discrimination complaints: discrimination arising from disability and failure to make reasonable adjustments.
The tribunal dismissed both complaints. The first was found not well-founded and the second was also found not well-founded. No monetary award is recorded in the written decision.
The record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless requested in time. The published decision therefore contains only the outcomes and does not set out further factual findings or detailed reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of discrimination arising from disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.