Case 6002003/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Diaco v Officine International Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6002003/2025
- Decision date
- 10 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer On
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Diaco
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningJudgment was entered under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 after the claim was sent to the respondent's registered office, the respondent had responded to other correspondence at that address, no response was filed, and no extension of time was sought. The matter was determined on the papers by Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer on 10 April 2025 at the London (South) Employment Tribunal.
The tribunal found that the respondent automatically unfairly dismissed the claimant on 18 July 2024 and awarded a compensatory award of £3,443.33 for past losses. It also found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages in July 2024, ordering payment of £1,780, and had failed to pay accrued but untaken holiday, ordering payment of £2,582.50.
The total sum the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant is £7,805.83. The claimant is responsible for any tax due on the sums paid in respect of the unlawful deduction and holiday pay items.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Automatically unfair dismissal on 18 July 2024; compensatory award of £3,443.33 for past losses. Default judgment under Rule 22 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. | Upheld | — | £3,443 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawful deduction from wages in July 2024; respondent ordered to pay £1,780. | Upheld | — | £1,780 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay accrued but untaken holiday; respondent ordered to pay £2,582.50. | Upheld | — | £2,583 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,806
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,443
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.