Case 6002029/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs. N. Fernley v Angard Staffing Solutions Ltd and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 6002029/2023
- Decision date
- 10 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sarah Bowen
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs. N. Fernley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard claims by Mrs N. Fernley against Angard Staffing Solutions Ltd and Royal Mail Group Ltd at Bristol Employment Tribunal on 10, 11 and 12 February 2025. The claimant appeared in person, assisted by her husband, and the respondents were represented by a solicitor.
The judgment records that the complaints of direct race discrimination and indirect race discrimination were not well-founded. Both complaints were dismissed against both respondents. Oral reasons were provided at the hearing, and no written reasons are included in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the complaint of direct race discrimination was not well-founded and was dismissed against both respondents. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the complaint of indirect race discrimination was not well-founded and was dismissed against both respondents. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.