Case 6002030/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E Joseph v Limitless Healthcare Services Limited Heard: BY CVP — 2024
- Case reference
- 6002030/2023
- Decision date
- 11 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs E Joseph
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented the claim on 8 October 2023, concerning dismissal on 3 October 2023. The respondent did not present a response form or grounds of resistance. The Tribunal therefore proceeded to a Rule 21 judgment on the material available on the file.
The claimant's application for interim relief was dismissed upon withdrawal. The allegation of unlawful demand and receipt of recruitment fees was also dismissed upon withdrawal.
The Tribunal found that the complaints of unlawful deduction from wages, holiday pay and notice pay succeeded. It ordered the respondent to pay gross sums of 9,086.53 for unlawfully deducted wages between 28 May and 3 October 2023, 432.69 for one week's notice pay, and 978.54 for 2.26 weeks' holiday pay, making a total payable of 10,497.76.
The Tribunal also recorded that the unfair dismissal complaint, described as whistleblowing, and the race and sex discrimination complaints were well founded and succeeded. Remedy for those claims was to be determined at a later hearing subject to separate case management orders.
Claims and outcomes
8 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Application for interim relief; dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Allegation of unlawful demand and receipt of recruitment fees; dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawfully deducted wages between 28 May and 3 October 2023. | Upheld | — | £9,087 |
| Breach of contract | One week's notice pay. | Upheld | — | £433 |
| Holiday pay | 2.26 weeks' holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £979 |
| Unfair dismissal | Judgment describes this as unfair dismissal (whistleblowing); remedy to be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Complaint found well founded and successful; remedy deferred. | Upheld | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | Complaint found well founded and successful; remedy deferred. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,498
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.