Case 6002032/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. D A Elliot v Townsend Harrison Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6002032/2023
- Decision date
- 10 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. D A Elliot
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 9 September 2024, Employment Judge Buckley Date struck out the claimant's discrimination arising from disability claim under section 15 of the Equality Act. The struck-out allegation was the claim identified in paragraphs 7.1.1 incident 2, 7.2 incident 2 and 7.3 incident 2 of the list of issues in the bundle, concerning the claimant's wish to sell his shares and take a lesser role in the firm because of his Asperger's, and his case that Simon Harrison prevented him from selling the shares for that reason.
The judgment records that this was a claim of discrimination arising from disability and that it was struck out. It does not set out any monetary remedy, and no award is recorded in the judgment.
The judgment states that the remaining claims will proceed to a final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment struck out the discrimination arising from disability claim under section 15 of the Equality Act, identified by reference to paragraphs 7.1.1 incident 2, 7.2 incident 2 and 7.3 incident 2 of the list of issues. The pleaded allegation was that Simon Harrison prevented the claimant from selling shares and taking a lesser role in the firm after he said he wanted to do so due to his Asperger's. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.