Case 6002040/2023 · Employment Tribunal
T Blakeston v SAY Scaffolding (Northern) Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6002040/2023
- Decision date
- 4 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bright
Parties
2 namedClaimant
T Blakeston
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy case management orders dated 7 February 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, explaining why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The judgment records that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Bright struck out the claim. The judgment does not decide any substantive employment complaint on its merits and does not record any monetary remedy. It also states that the hearing fixed for 7 June 2024 would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type(s); it records only that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued after the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.