Case 6002056/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Nnaji v Care UK Care Services Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6002056/2025
- Decision date
- 13 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Allen KC
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Nnaji
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge A Allen KC, sitting alone at the East London Hearing Centre on 13 June 2025, made a judgment requiring the Respondent, Care UK Care Services Limited, to pay the Claimant, Mrs M Nnaji, a total of £1,005.80. The Claimant appeared in person and the Respondent was represented by Mr Kerfoot of counsel.
The sum comprises £600 in respect of a joiner incentive, £250 in respect of a refer-a-friend payment, £92 reflecting amounts conceded by the Respondent due to incorrect classification of amounts which should have been paid at overtime rates, and £63.80 reflecting an incorrect rate of payment for normal shifts during night time.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The written record does not set out separate legal tests or statutory references.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Total award comprises £600 joiner incentive, £250 refer-a-friend, £92 for amounts conceded by the Respondent due to incorrect classification of amounts which should have been paid at overtime rates, and £63.80 for incorrect rate of payment for normal shifts during night time. The judgment does not separately label working time / night shift element as a distinct claim heading; treated here as unlawful deduction of wages encompassing the conceded sums. | Upheld | — | £1,006 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,006
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.