Case 6002071/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Kleo Rira v Yamazaki Mazak UK Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6002071/2025
- Decision date
- 22 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Kleo Rira
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 22 October 2025, Employment Judge A Smith recorded that the complaints of redundancy payment, notice pay, holiday pay, arrears of pay, and other payments were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant, Mr Kleo Rira, against Yamazaki Mazak UK Limited. The judgment does not contain any merits findings on those complaints.
The judgment also records that the claimant's remaining claims would proceed to hearing. No remedy, liability finding, or legal test was set out in this short judgment.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay complaint dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Arrears of pay complaint dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Other payments complaint dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.