Case 6002081/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Peter Ashley v Restaurant & Grill Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6002081/2025
- Decision date
- 14 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tegerdine Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Peter Ashley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningFollowing a hearing by video at Leeds on 14 May 2026, the tribunal dismissed Peter Ashley’s complaint that Restaurant & Grill Limited had unfairly dismissed him for exercising rights under section 57A of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal gave its reasons orally at the hearing.
The tribunal upheld Ashley’s complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages. It ordered Restaurant & Grill Limited to pay him £2,666.67 gross, representing wages properly payable for December 2024. Payment was due on or before 28 May 2026.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint concerned dismissal for exercising rights under section 57A of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Gross award for December 2024 wages, payable on or before 28 May 2026. | Upheld | — | £2,667 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,667
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 57A of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.