Case 6002127/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Maris v JELD-WEN UK Limited HELD In Sheffield — 2024
- Case reference
- 6002127/2023
- Decision date
- 20 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Maris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy consent, the tribunal recorded that on 10 July 2023 at 06:50 the claimant made a disclosure to JELD-WEN UK Limited which was a protected disclosure for the purposes of Part IVA of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal then found that the principal reason for the respondent’s dismissal of the claimant on 14 July 2023 was that disclosure.
On that basis, the claimant’s complaint under section 103A ERA 1996 succeeded. No basic award was made because the claimant had insufficient qualifying service for section 119(1) ERA 1996.
The compensatory award was assessed at £9,916.84. The tribunal calculated 16 weeks’ loss of earnings from 14 July 2023 to 30 November 2023 on the basis of net weekly pay of £1,360 inclusive of car allowance and employer pension contributions at 3%, then deducted two weeks’ remuneration received from the respondent and earnings from alternative employment from 16 October 2023 to 30 November 2023. It then applied a 25% ACAS uplift under section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, followed by reductions of 10% for lack of good faith under section 126(6A) ERA 1996 and 25% for contributory conduct under section 123(6) ERA 1996.
The claimant’s application for a Preparation Time Order was withdrawn and dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | By consent, the claimant made a protected disclosure on 10 July 2023 at 06:50. The tribunal found the principal reason for the dismissal on 14 July 2023 was that disclosure, so the section 103A ERA 1996 complaint succeeded. | Upheld | — | £9,917 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,917
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £9,917
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
6 references- Part IVA Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.103A ERA 1996
- s.119(1) ERA 1996
- s.207A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- s.126(6A) ERA 1996
- s.123(6) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.