Case 6002152/2025 · Employment Tribunal
H Khan v Wine Dining Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6002152/2025
- Decision date
- 11 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater
Parties
2 namedClaimant
H Khan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Wine Dining Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from H Khan's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £646.00 under rule 22.
The tribunal also recorded that no award was made for compensation for stress and time spent by the claimant, because it had no jurisdiction to award such compensation in the circumstances. The hearing listed for 22 April 2025 was cancelled.
The separate notice on interest stated that interest is payable on tribunal awards of money, that no interest is payable if the sum is paid within 14 days after the written record of the decision is sent to the parties, and that the stipulated rate in this case was 8% per annum. No quantified interest amount was stated in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £646.00. | Upheld | — | £646 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £646
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.