Case 6002174/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Vivian Uzowuihe v Destiny Social Care Provider Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6002174/2025
- Decision date
- 17 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T Knowles Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Vivian Uzowuihe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy consent, the Tribunal recorded that the correct identity of the Respondent was Destiny Social Care Provider Limited.
The Tribunal found the Claimant's breach of contract claim for expenses was well founded and succeeded, and ordered the Respondent to pay damages of 600.00. It also found the Claimant's unauthorised deductions from wages claim, covering pay and holiday pay, was well founded and succeeded, and ordered payment of 2,863.68 gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this as breach of contract for expenses and states it was well founded and succeeds. | Upheld | — | £600 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes unauthorised deductions from wages covering pay and holiday pay, and awards a single gross sum for both. | Upheld | — | £2,864 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay is included within the successful unauthorised deductions claim, but the judgment does not split the pay and holiday pay components. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,464
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.