Case 6002233/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v East Midlands Ambulance — 2024
- Case reference
- 6002233/2023
- Decision date
- 2 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 16 August 2024, Employment Judge JM Wade, sitting in chambers, varied the judgment sent to the parties on 2 April 2024. He did so after receiving the parties' joint letter of 21 June seeking directions to transfer the case to Nottingham and progress it there, and after considering earlier emails together with a later clarifying email that had not been before him when the original judgment was settled.
The varied judgment records that the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, arrears of pay and other payments were dismissed on their withdrawal. The judge explained that the earlier judgment had been settled in terms that recorded a withdrawal because the correspondence available at the time appeared to show a wholesale withdrawal of the Leeds claim. The later clarification justified varying the judgment in the interests of justice rather than treating the earlier judgment as a certificate of correction issue.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed on withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment refers to 'arrears of pay and other payments' and dismisses those complaints on withdrawal; no further legal basis is specified in the text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.