Case 6002247/2023 · Employment Tribunal
C Carlisle v Aldi RDC — 2023
- Case reference
- 6002247/2023
- Decision date
- 28 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
C Carlisle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, C Carlisle, brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against Aldi RDC. The tribunal recorded that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have at least two years' service to bring an unfair dismissal claim, and found that the claimant had been employed for less than two years.
Because the claimant was not entitled to bring the proceedings, the tribunal struck out the claim. It also found that the claimant had not given an acceptable reason, رغم being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claimant complained of unfair dismissal, but the claim was struck out because section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires at least two years' service and the claimant had less than two years' service. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.