Case 6002265/2023 · Employment Tribunal
- IN PERSON FOR THE v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 6002265/2023
- Decision date
- 21 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
- Panel members
- Ms D England, Mr C Williams
Parties
1 namedClaimant
- IN PERSON FOR THE
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal at Bristol heard the case over several days in February 2025 and gave a unanimous judgment that the claimant's claims of constructive unfair dismissal, failure to make reasonable adjustments under s20 Equality Act 2010, and victimisation under s27 Equality Act 2010 were not well founded. All three claims were dismissed.
The judgment does not record any monetary award or other remedy. It also notes that the respondent asked orally at the hearing for full written reasons, which would be provided in due course.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes this as a claim of constructive unfair dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments under s20 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation claim under s27 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.