Case 6002307/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Caroline Clements v OVO Energy Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6002307/2023
- Decision date
- 28 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Gray-Jones
- Venue
- Southampton
- Panel members
- Mrs J Killick, Miss J Ratnayake
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Caroline Clements
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Caroline Clements succeeded in four of the six complaints of failure to make reasonable adjustments under ss.20-21 Equality Act 2010. The tribunal upheld the complaints relating to PCP1, PCP2, PCP3 and PCP5, with PCP3 upheld by a majority and Mrs Killick dissenting. The remaining reasonable adjustment complaints, PCP4 and PCP6, were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
9 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make a reasonable adjustment complaint in relation to PCP1 (para 5.2.1) upheld. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make a reasonable adjustment complaint in relation to PCP2 (para 5.2.2) upheld. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make a reasonable adjustment complaint in relation to PCP3 (para 5.2.3) upheld by a majority; Mrs Killick dissented. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make a reasonable adjustment complaint in relation to PCP5 (para 5.2.5) upheld. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make a reasonable adjustment complaint in relation to PCP4 (para 5.2.4) dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make a reasonable adjustment complaint in relation to PCP6 (para 5.2.6) dismissed. |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- ss.20-21 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.