Case 6002350/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Gunning v Jhetam Developments Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6002350/2024
- Decision date
- 15 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Park Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Gunning
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mr P Gunning’s claim for unlawful deduction from wages under section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996 was well founded and ordered Jhetam Developments Limited to pay £763.89 gross. It also found the holiday pay claim well founded and ordered £423.08 gross.
The tribunal found that the respondent had not provided the claimant with a written statement of particulars of employment. Under section 38 Employment Act 2002, it ordered payment of £2,115.38, described as the equivalent of two weeks’ pay.
The judgment also records that the claimant was dismissed without notice, but the respondent had already paid a sum in lieu of notice before the hearing, so no further compensation was due in respect of notice pay. The total monetary award recorded by the judgment is £3,302.35 gross.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claim under section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996 was well founded and ordered payment of £763.89 gross. | Upheld | — | £764 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held that the holiday pay claim was well founded and ordered payment of £423.08 gross. | Upheld | — | £423 |
| Other | The respondent had not provided a written statement of particulars of employment. The tribunal ordered payment under section 38 Employment Act 2002, equivalent to two weeks' pay, in the sum of £2,115.38. | Upheld | — | £2,115 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the claimant was dismissed without notice, but the respondent had already paid a sum in lieu of notice before the hearing, so no further compensation was due in respect of notice pay. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,302
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.