Case 6002401/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Cooke v Fideli CK Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6002401/2023
- Decision date
- 1 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Cooke
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant, Ms A Cooke, failed to comply with an Unless Order dated 22 August 2024. As a result, the claims were struck out on 29 August 2024 as an administrative action.
The judgment states that it confirms the dismissal of all claims. It does not record any substantive findings on liability, evidence, or remedy, and it does not allocate any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment does not set out the pleaded particulars, but the case listing identified disability discrimination as one of the claims. The claims were struck out on 29 August 2024 for failure to comply with the Unless Order dated 22 August 2024. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment does not set out the pleaded particulars, but the case listing identified public interest disclosure as one of the claims. The claims were struck out on 29 August 2024 for failure to comply with the Unless Order dated 22 August 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not give claim particulars, but the case listing identified unfair dismissal as one of the claims. The claims were struck out on 29 August 2024 for failure to comply with the Unless Order dated 22 August 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.