Mr M Ali v Uber London Limited — 2025

Case reference: 6002471/2025
Decision date: 12 June 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Whittall REPRESENTATION

Indexed: 18 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr M Ali

Respondent

Uber London Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal recorded that the claim was not presented within the applicable time limit. It also recorded that it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented within that limit.

On that basis, the Tribunal dismissed the claim. The written judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and does not set out further factual findings or any remedy.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment records that the claim was not presented within the applicable time limit, that it was reasonably practicable to do so, and that the claim was therefore dismissed. The written judgment is short and gives no further reasons beyond the oral reasons.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.