Case 6002477/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Sandra Wynter v Hyde Housing Association Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6002477/2024
- Decision date
- 15 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lumby REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Sandra Wynter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Lumby on 15 May 2025. The tribunal dealt only with limitation issues and did not determine the merits of any complaint. It found that the unfair dismissal complaint had not been presented within the applicable time limit and that it had been reasonably practicable to present it in time, so that complaint was dismissed.
The tribunal also considered complaints of discrimination and victimisation arising from the claimant's dismissal. Those complaints were not presented within the applicable time limit, but the tribunal held that it was just and equitable to extend the time limit, so those complaints were allowed to proceed. The tribunal said it would consider at the final hearing whether any discrimination and victimisation complaints not arising from the dismissal had been brought in time. No monetary award was made at this stage.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint of unfair dismissal was not presented within the applicable time limit. The tribunal found that it was reasonably practicable to present it in time, so the complaint was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The complaints of discrimination arising from the claimant's dismissal were presented out of time, but the tribunal held that it was just and equitable to extend the time limit. Those complaints were allowed to proceed to the final hearing. | Other | — | — |
| Victimisation | The victimisation complaint arising from the claimant's dismissal was presented out of time, but the tribunal held that it was just and equitable to extend the time limit. That complaint was allowed to proceed to the final hearing. The tribunal also noted that it would consider at the final hearing whether any discrimination and victimisation complaints not arising from the dismissal were brought in time. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable time limit
- just and equitable time limit
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.