Case 6002562/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs V L Naylor v Teleperformance limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6002562/2023
- Decision date
- 8 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lambert Representation
- Venue
- Bristol Civil Justice Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs V L Naylor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Bristol Civil Justice Centre on 10 and 14 March 2025, Employment Judge Lambert considered claims for automatic unfair dismissal for protected disclosure under section 103A ERA, detriment for making a protected disclosure under section 48 ERA, ordinary unfair dismissal under section 111 ERA, disability discrimination under sections 13 and 15 Equality Act 2010, and sex discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010. The tribunal held that the section 103A and section 48 claims were presented outside the relevant time limit and that it was reasonably practicable for them to have been brought in time, so the tribunal lacked jurisdiction over those claims.
For the discrimination complaints, the tribunal held that claims arising before 14 August 2023 were out of time and that it was not just and equitable to extend time under section 123 Equality Act 2010. The remaining claims, including the ordinary unfair dismissal claim and the non-time-barred parts of the disability and sex discrimination claims, were found not well-founded and were dismissed. The judgment notes that an equal pay claim had also been raised, but it was not part of this hearing and was to be dealt with separately.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Automatic unfair dismissal by reason of protected disclosure under section 103A ERA: the tribunal held the claim was presented outside the relevant time limit and that it was reasonably practicable for the Claimant to bring it in time, so it lacked jurisdiction. | Other | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Detriment for making a protected/public interest disclosure under section 48 ERA: the tribunal held the claim was presented outside the relevant time limit and that it was reasonably practicable for the Claimant to bring it in time, so it lacked jurisdiction. | Other | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Ordinary unfair dismissal under section 111 ERA was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Disability discrimination under sections 13 and 15 Equality Act 2010: the tribunal held that claims arising before 14 August 2023 were out of time and it was not just and equitable to extend time; the remaining disability discrimination claims were dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | Sex discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010: the tribunal held that claims arising before 14 August 2023 were out of time and it was not just and equitable to extend time; the remaining sex discrimination claims were dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
- section 123 Equality Act 2010 time limit
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.