Case 6002570/2025 · Employment Tribunal
MS DEBBIE ELLIS v Cargo Marketing Services Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6002570/2025
- Decision date
- 3 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N. Clarke
- Panel members
- Miss R. Addison, Mr P. Deneen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MS DEBBIE ELLIS
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Ms Debbie Ellis was disabled within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 at the relevant times.
Her claims of direct disability discrimination under section 13 and discrimination arising from disability under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010 were found to be unfounded and were dismissed. The judgment records that summary reasons were given orally but does not set out the factual findings or reasoning for dismissing those claims.
The claimant's application for the panel to recuse itself was also dismissed. No monetary remedy was awarded or recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination claim determined under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability claim determined under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 6 of the Equality Act 2010
- section 13 of the Equality Act 2010
- section 15 of the Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.