Case 6002633/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Ciocan v Eaton Grove Eco Build Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6002633/2025
- Decision date
- 8 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moor Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Ciocan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Ciocan worked as a labourer for Eaton Grove Eco Build Limited from 23 September 2024 to 30 October 2024. He claimed that he was not paid for the last two weeks of that work. The respondent did not present a response and did not attend the hearing. Employment Judge Moor found the respondent had been properly served and accepted the claimant's evidence.
The tribunal found that the claimant was not paid for work from 14 October 2024 until 30 October 2024, which the reasons describe as 2.6 weeks or 13 days. It found that he was entitled to £520 net pay per week and that an unlawful deduction from wages had therefore been made under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claim was also found to be in time under section 23, taking account of ACAS Early Conciliation.
The complaint of unlawful deduction of wages was held to be well-founded and succeeded. The tribunal awarded the claimant £1,352.00, described as the amount of the unlawfully deducted wages. The reasons also note that Companies House showed the respondent was dissolved on 29 July 2025, which may make enforcement difficult.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that he was not paid for work from 14 October 2024 to 30 October 2024. The reasons refer to 2.6 weeks unpaid and state the claimant was entitled to £520 net pay per week. The calculation line contains a numerical inconsistency ('3.6 x £520') but the award made was £1,352.00. | Upheld | — | £1,352 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,352
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.