Case 6002729/2024 · Employment Tribunal
J Collier v Rosen Haulage Ltd (in Voluntary Liquidation) and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 6002729/2024
- Decision date
- 21 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bright
Parties
3 namedClaimant
J Collier
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the North East Employment Tribunal on 22 May 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Bright recorded that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It also found that the respondent had dismissed the claimant in breach of contract in respect of notice.
In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to provide itemized pay statements to the claimant. The judgment records that remedy would be determined at a separate Remedy Hearing listed for 3 February 2025.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the respondent dismissed the claimant in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The judgment states that the respondent failed to provide itemized pay statements to the claimant. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.