Case 6002741/2026 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Bielawski v Veolia — 2026
- Case reference
- 6002741/2026
- Decision date
- 9 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Bielawski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Dunlop refused Mr M Bielawski’s application for interim relief against Veolia UK Limited following a hearing by CVP at Manchester Employment Tribunal on 9 June 2026. Reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written judgment does not set out the factual findings or legal reasoning for the refusal, or determine the underlying claim.
The tribunal ordered Mr Bielawski to pay £500 towards Veolia UK Limited’s costs of defending the application, within 28 days of the judgment being sent to the parties. The judgment was sent on 19 August 2026. The £500 recorded as the total award is this costs contribution payable by the claimant; no compensation award to him is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The application for interim relief was refused. The judgment does not identify or determine the underlying claim. The £500 costs order is payable by the claimant to the respondent, not compensation awarded to the claimant. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.