Case 6002773/2025 · Employment Tribunal
C Bullen v SH Events Global Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6002773/2025
- Decision date
- 1 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
C Bullen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented on 27 January 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the matter under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure. No hearing is recorded in the extracted judgment. The decision was issued by Employment Judge Phil Allen and sent to the parties on 1 August 2025.
The tribunal found that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded. It awarded the claimant £3,846.15 gross, described in the judgment as unpaid wages for five weeks at a weekly rate of £769.23. The judgment does not separate any additional element within that wage award.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had breached the contract of employment by failing to pay expenses. It awarded damages of £652.81 for that breach. The total sum payable to the claimant was stated as £4,498.96.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded and awarded £3,846.15 gross, described as five weeks' unpaid wages at £769.23 per week. | Upheld | — | £3,846 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that the respondent breached the contract of employment by failing to pay expenses and awarded damages of £652.81. | Upheld | — | £653 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,499
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.