Case 6002782/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Ninka Duval v The Wardens and Commonalty of the Mystery or Goldsmiths of the City of London, commonly known as The Worshipful Company of Goldsmiths — 2025
- Case reference
- 6002782/2024
- Decision date
- 1 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khan
- Venue
- London Central
- Panel members
- Ms Z Darmas, Mr S Godecharle
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard Ms Ninka Duval's claims of race discrimination and unfair dismissal against The Wardens and Commonalty of the Mystery or Goldsmiths of the City of London, commonly known as The Worshipful Company of Goldsmiths, over hearings on 7, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 17 November 2025. The case was heard by Employment Judge Khan with Ms Z Darmas and Mr S Godecharle sitting as members. Judgment was given on 21 November 2025 by Employment Judge Khan sitting alone.
The unanimous judgment was that both complaints were not well founded. The race discrimination complaint was dismissed, and the unfair dismissal complaint was also dismissed. The extracted judgment does not record any remedy, award, or further findings on liability beyond those outcomes.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.