Case 6002786/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Y Ribeiro v The Baguette Deli Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6002786/2024
- Decision date
- 2 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Y Ribeiro
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 23 May 2024. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge therefore made a determination under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 without a contested hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £4,138.20 gross, and the judgment states that the claimant must account to HMRC for any sums owed in respect of the payment received.
The judgment records that the hearing listed for 8 November 2024 was cancelled. The total amount payable under the judgment was £4,138.20.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £4,138.20 gross. | Upheld | — | £4,138 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,138
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.