Case 6002790/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Kedra v Clear AV Limited CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Under — 2025
- Case reference
- 6002790/2024
- Decision date
- 19 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Kedra
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe extracted document is a certificate of correction under Rule 67 for the judgment sent to the parties on 19 September 2025. It records that the judgment is corrected by inserting the case number 6002790/2024 at the top of the corrected judgment. The document is approved by Employment Judge Davidson on 25 September 2025 and sent to the parties on 3 October 2025.
No substantive tribunal findings, claim outcomes, or remedy figures appear in the extracted text provided here. The certificate also states that the time limits for seeking written reasons, reconsideration, or appeal are unchanged and continue to run from the date of the original judgment or reasons.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted text supplied here is only a certificate of correction under Rule 67 and does not set out any substantive claim, finding, liability decision, or remedy. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 67
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.