Case 6002794/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Akaliga Sivanesan v Ivory Group Real Estate Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6002794/2024
- Decision date
- 21 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Oldroyd Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Akaliga Sivanesan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal amended the respondent's name to Ivory Group Real Estate Limited. The respondent did not attend the hearing, and the claimant appeared in person.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant GBP 2,323 gross. The judgment states that this sum was for an unlawful deduction of wages covering two weeks' pay, two weeks' pay in lieu of notice, and 3 days of holiday pay. Written reasons were not provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes the gross sum as an unlawful deduction of wages including two weeks' pay; it does not split the award by component. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment includes two weeks' pay in lieu of notice within the gross award but does not separately label or quantify this component. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment includes 3 days of holiday pay within the gross award but does not separately quantify this component. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,323
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.