Case 6002839/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Lord-Stamp v Mace Consult Ltd and 2 others — 2025
- Case reference
- 6002839/2024
- Decision date
- 22 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Keogh
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Ms T Lord-Stamp
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal refused the respondent’s application dated 4 July 2025 for reconsideration of the judgment sent on 22 June 2025. It held that there was no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked because substantially the same application had already been made and refused.
On time limits, the tribunal said that the issue would be dealt with at the final hearing after hearing all the evidence. It noted that discrimination claims should only be struck out in the most obvious and plain cases, because they are often fact-sensitive, and that there may be an argument that the claimant’s allegations formed conduct extending over a period of time so that a just and equitable extension of time could be considered.
On res judicata and abuse of process, the tribunal recorded that the second claim had been treated separately from the first claim and that no decision had been made on it at the earlier preliminary hearing. It referred to the earlier procedural history, including the legal officer’s view that the claims should be considered together, the preliminary hearing before EJ Keogh on 3 April 2025, and the later agreed list of issues covering both claims. Because no decision had been made on the second claim, the tribunal held that the res judicata / abuse of process application could not succeed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This entry records the respondent’s application for reconsideration, which the tribunal refused. The judgment does not finally determine the underlying discrimination claims on their merits. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- reasonable prospect of varying or revoking on reconsideration
- strike out only in the most obvious and plain cases
- just and equitable extension of time
- res judicata / abuse of process
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.