Case 6002869/2024 · Employment Tribunal
H Grewal v Dumbledore Dental Care Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6002869/2024
- Decision date
- 28 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bax Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
H Grewal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claimant’s whistleblowing complaint. It recorded that, by letter dated 20 January 2025, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the complaint should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the whistleblowing complaint.
The judgment states that the claimant’s remaining claim(s) remained listed for hearing on 7 March 2025. No monetary award was made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Struck out because the complaint had not been actively pursued. The tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 20 January 2025 to make representations or request a hearing, but no sufficient representations or hearing request were made. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.