Case 6002923/2026 · Employment Tribunal
Joshua Cerrino v Matt Gregory Interiors Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6002923/2026
- Decision date
- 22 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Joshua Cerrino
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningJoshua Cerrino presented the claim on 21 January 2026. Matt Gregory Interiors Limited did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Heap decided that the claim could properly be determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The Tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £1,311.82 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £543.60 gross. The total award was £1,855.42, and the hearing listed for 28 August 2026 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award was stated as a gross sum. | Upheld | — | £1,312 |
| Holiday pay | The award was stated as a gross sum. | Upheld | — | £544 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,855
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.