Case 6002927/2026 · Employment Tribunal
Dominika Kedzierska v Property Concierge Group Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6002927/2026
- Decision date
- 21 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harfield
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dominika Kedzierska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Wales Employment Tribunal on 21 January 2026. The respondent failed to present a valid response in time, and Employment Judge Harfield determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure that the claim could properly be decided on the papers without a hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered it to pay £553.50 gross, and that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered it to pay £300. The total sum ordered was £853.50, with the claimant responsible for any income tax and employee national insurance contributions due. The hearing listed for 7 May 2026 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 22 determination on the papers after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Tribunal ordered payment of £553.50 gross for unauthorised deductions from wages; rounded to nearest GBP. | Upheld | — | £554 |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £300. The judgment refers to holiday entitlement; categorised here as holiday_pay (the gov.uk listing flagged working_time, but the substantive award relates to unpaid holiday). | Upheld | — | £300 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £854
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.