Case 6002947/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Harper v Rooms Food and Drink Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6002947/2024
- Decision date
- 7 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Harper
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure on the basis of the claimant's pleaded case. The judgment finds the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £265.71 gross in respect of the unauthorised deductions and £32.07 in respect of unpaid holiday entitlement, giving a total of £297.28. The hearing listed for 17 January 2025 was cancelled.
The judgment is short and contains no further reasons, legal analysis, or findings beyond the orders set out above.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 determination following the respondent's failure to present a valid response on time. Award stated as gross. | Upheld | — | £266 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday entitlement under the Working Time Regulations. Rule 21 determination. | Upheld | — | £32 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £297
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.