Case 6002994/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Brett v Raigins Group Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6002994/2024
- Decision date
- 1 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leith Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Brett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Croydon by CVP on 1 December 2025 before Employment Judge Leith, with the Claimant appearing in person and no attendance or representation for the Respondent. The judgment records a single working time finding: the Respondent failed to allow Miss L Brett to take annual leave in accordance with Regulations 13 and 15 of the Working Time Regulations 1998.
The claim succeeded and the tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay £247.80 by way of compensation. The judgment also states that the Claimant is responsible for any income tax and national insurance due on that sum. No other remedies or claims are recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The tribunal found that the Respondent failed to allow the Claimant to take annual leave in accordance with Regulations 13 and 15 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £248 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £248
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £248
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.