Case 6002995/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Joel Smith v Floor Pro Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6002995/2025
- Decision date
- 12 August 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Joel Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Broughton decided that the claim, or part of it, could properly be determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that Floor Pro LTD had made unauthorised deductions from Joel Smith's wages and ordered it to pay £2,349.39 gross. It also found a breach of contract arising from unpaid employer pension contributions and awarded £70.67 for November 2024 and £81.24 for December 2024. The total payable was £2,501.30, less deductions for tax and National Insurance.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award was stated as a gross sum. | Upheld | — | £2,349 |
| Breach of contract | This comprises £70.67 for the unpaid employer pension contribution for November 2024 and £81.24 for December 2024. | Upheld | — | £152 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,501
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.