Case 6003002/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Smethurst v Sircus Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6003002/2025
- Decision date
- 6 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Eeley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Smethurst
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time and the tribunal therefore made a determination under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024. Employment Judge Eeley found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded and ordered payment of £160 gross. The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £2,400 gross as damages, calculated gross to reflect the likelihood the sum would be taxed as Post Employment Notice Pay.
The tribunal further found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,000. The holiday pay complaint was also well-founded, the tribunal finding that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant in accordance with regulation 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998, and £560 was ordered (with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance).
The total amount payable by the respondent under the judgment is £6,120.00. The hearing previously listed for 5 June 2025 was cancelled. A notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 was issued, with the relevant decision day recorded as 6 May 2025 and the stipulated rate of interest at 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded; gross sum of £160 ordered. | Upheld | — | £160 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice; £2,400 gross awarded as damages, calculated gross to reflect likely tax treatment as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £2,400 |
| Redundancy | Claimant dismissed by reason of redundancy; entitled to redundancy payment of £3,000. | Upheld | — | £3,000 |
| Holiday pay | Complaint in respect of holiday pay well-founded; respondent failed to pay in accordance with regulation 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998; £560 ordered (claimant responsible for any tax/NI). | Upheld | — | £560 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,120
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024
- Regulation 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, Article 12
- Section 17 of the Judgments Act 1838
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.