Case 6003064/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J East v Loungers Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6003064/2024
- Decision date
- 11 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J East
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Bristol by CVP on 27 May 2025, before Employment Judge J S Burns, the claimant appeared in person with assistance from her father and the respondent was represented by counsel. The written judgment records that the claims are dismissed. No monetary award was recorded in the judgment.
Following an adjournment for discussions, the judge was informed by the respondent's counsel and the respondent's HR manager, Mr Gough, that the claims had been settled that day through ACAS. The judgment nevertheless records dismissal and states that, if the claimant did not agree, she should apply to the Tribunal for reconsideration within 7 days of the document being sent. The judgment was sent to the parties on 11 June 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment states that the claims were dismissed and gives no separate analysis of this head of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The written judgment states that the claims were dismissed and gives no separate analysis of this head of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.