Case 6003155/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Sophie Theakston v Pool & Spa Manufacturing Limited (in compulsory liquidation) Heard: by Cloud Video Platform on 19 March 2025 — 2025
- Case reference
- 6003155/2024
- Decision date
- 27 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ayre Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Sophie Theakston
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Sophie Theakston, brought claims including unfair dismissal, notice pay and holiday pay after working for the respondent from 5 July 2023 until 30 March 2024. The background to this reconsideration judgment records that the unfair dismissal claim had already been struck out in the judgment sent on 27 January 2025 because she had been employed for less than two years.
At the hearing on 19 March 2025, the main issue was whether the claimant had been employed by One Pool & Spa Limited, company number 12607128, or by Pool & Spa Manufacturing Limited, company number 14446259. The tribunal found that both the original contract and the replacement contract identified company number 14446259, that the claimant accepted in evidence that this was the company that employed her, and that the company had changed names over time from One Pool & Spa Ltd to One Pool and Spa Manufacturing Ltd and then Pool & Spa Manufacturing Ltd. The company now known as One Pool & Spa Ltd was therefore not the claimant's employer and was removed as a respondent.
The tribunal noted that, at the end of the hearing, it had orally indicated that the claimant would succeed on notice pay and holiday pay and that sums would be ordered. It then reconsidered that oral judgment after checking section 130(2) of the Insolvency Act 1986, because the remaining respondent was in compulsory liquidation. The written judgment states that proceedings against a company in compulsory liquidation must be stayed without the court's permission, so the oral judgment was varied and replaced by a stay rather than a final substantive award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The background to this reconsideration judgment records that the unfair dismissal claim had already been struck out in the judgment sent on 27 January 2025 because the claimant had been employed for less than two years. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claim form sought one month's notice pay of £3,333.33. At the March hearing the judge orally indicated that the claimant would succeed, but the written judgment was then reconsidered and replaced by a stay because Pool & Spa Manufacturing Ltd was in compulsory liquidation, so no final merits award survived. | Other | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim form sought holiday pay of £799.92 for 4.8 days. At the March hearing the judge orally indicated that the claimant would succeed, but the written judgment was then reconsidered and replaced by a stay because Pool & Spa Manufacturing Ltd was in compulsory liquidation, so no final merits award survived. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 130(2) of the Insolvency Act 1986
- Rule 68 of The Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.