Case 6003165/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Dominik v YGL Group of Associates Ltd Heard by video — 2024
- Case reference
- 6003165/2024
- Decision date
- 5 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H Dominik
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Corrigan, heard by video on 5 December 2024, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel. The issue determined was whether the tribunal had jurisdiction to consider the claims despite the claim being out of time.
The tribunal found that it was not reasonably practicable for Mrs H Dominik to submit her claim on time, and that she submitted it within such further period as was reasonable. On that basis, the tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to consider her claims.
The judgment does not determine any substantive claim and records no liability findings or remedy award. It is limited to the limitation issue at the preliminary hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal decided that it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to present the claim in time and that it was presented within such further period as was reasonable, so the tribunal had jurisdiction to consider the claims. No substantive liability claim was determined in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.