Case 6003203/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. Soares v Kasha Services UK Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6003203/2025
- Decision date
- 3 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cawthray Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. Soares
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 3 October 2025 before Employment Judge Cawthray, sitting at London South by video, the tribunal recorded that the claimant's complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was well-founded. The respondent's counter complaint of breach of contract was also well-founded. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by its Head of Operations.
The parties agreed the compensation for damages. The tribunal recorded that the claimant was entitled to a payment equivalent to 10 weeks' net pay, assessed at £11,069.84. The parties agreed that damages payable to the respondent on its counterclaim were £3,500.00, and that this sum should be offset against the amount due to the claimant. The resulting sum payable by the respondent to the claimant was £7,569.84.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claimant's complaint of breach of contract was in relation to notice pay. | Upheld | — | £11,070 |
| Breach of contract | The respondent's counter complaint of breach of contract was well-founded; the parties agreed damages at £3,500 and that sum was offset against the claimant's award. | Upheld | — | £3,500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,570
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.