Mr M G Nasara v PGS Recruitment — 2025

Case reference: 6003207/2024
Decision date: 17 March 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge James

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr M G Nasara

Respondent

PGS Recruitment

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal in Mr M G Nasara v PGS Recruitment ordered that all of the claim be struck out. The judgment records that the claimant had been given an opportunity by letter dated 4 February 2025 to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.

The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge James struck out the claim. No remedy was awarded and the judgment does not record any substantive determination on the underlying merits of the claim.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	The Tribunal stated that all of the claim was struck out because the claimant failed to make representations, or sufficient representations, in response to the letter dated 4 February 2025, and did not request a hearing.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.