Case 6003232/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Paulina Bawej v Huangs Catering Limited and 2 others — 2024
- Case reference
- 6003232/2024
- Decision date
- 3 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howden-Evans
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Miss Paulina Bawej
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 after the respondents failed to present a valid response in time. The judgment records that in earlier case 3313273/2019 Huangs Grill Limited was found to have discriminated against the Claimant on grounds of pregnancy, and the reasons in that case found Yingshang Huang had personally committed acts of pregnancy discrimination. A settlement of £35,492.31 in the earlier case remained outstanding, with Huangs Grill Limited's accounts recording a net liability of £807,124.
The Claimant brought this claim to hold Yingshang Huang personally liable. The Employment Judge was satisfied the tribunal had jurisdiction notwithstanding the time elapsed, relying on the just and equitable extension in section 123(1) Equality Act 2010. The judge found the Second Respondent had discriminated against the Claimant on grounds of her pregnancy and ordered him to pay £35,492.31. The claims against the First Respondent (Huangs Catering Limited) and the Third Respondent (Janice Kim) were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Claim against the Second Respondent (Yingshang Huang), found personally liable for pregnancy discrimination previously attributed to him in case 3313273/2019. Tribunal exercised the just and equitable extension under s.123(1) Equality Act 2010. Award figure £35,492.31 rounded to integer GBP. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | £35,492 |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Claim against the First Respondent (Huangs Catering Limited) was dismissed. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Claim against the Third Respondent (Janice Kim) was dismissed. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £35,492
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 123(1) Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.