Case 6003253/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E Gorman v YVC Retail limited Heard: By CVP, at Nottingham — 2025
- Case reference
- 6003253/2024
- Decision date
- 19 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs E Gorman
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Clark, sitting alone at Nottingham by CVP, held that Mrs E Gorman’s claim for unauthorised deduction from wages succeeded in part. The tribunal ordered YVC Retail Limited to pay the claimant the net sum of £342.75 in respect of the deduction claim.
The tribunal also found that, at the date the claim was presented, the respondent was in breach of s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996 in relation to a qualifying claim within Schedule 5 of the Employment Act 2002. As a result, s.38 of the Employment Act 2002 applied and the respondent was ordered to pay a further sum of £483.46, calculated as two weeks’ pay at £241.72 per week.
The total award due was therefore £826.21.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim succeeded in part. The tribunal ordered payment of the net sum of £342.75 and also made an additional award under s.38 Employment Act 2002 because, at the date the claim was presented, the respondent was in breach of s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £343 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £826
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.