Case 6003303/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T Harris v Jan Veende — 2025
- Case reference
- 6003303/2024
- Decision date
- 10 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs T Harris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Employment Tribunal on 4 June 2024. The respondent did not present a valid response in time, and Employment Judge Livesey determined that the claim could properly be decided under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
On the merits, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s notice. It awarded the claimant the net sum of £500 for that head of claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £600.00 for that claim. The judgment records a total award of £1,100.00.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay notice and awarded the net sum of £500. | Upheld | — | £500 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered £600.00. | Upheld | — | £600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,100
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.