Case 6003311/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Matt Lott v Yepic Ai Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6003311/2025
- Decision date
- 11 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Rao Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Matt Lott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal decided liability only. It found that the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages for the period 1 October 2024 to 2 December 2024 inclusive was well-founded and succeeded.
The Tribunal also found that the holiday pay complaint for the same period under regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 was well-founded and succeeded. The breach of contract claim for notice pay was dismissed upon withdrawal, and the breach of contract claim concerning late pension contributions was dismissed because the claimant had opted out of the relevant pension scheme.
The parties were directed to provide submissions on remedy under case management orders sent with the judgment, so no remedy figures were determined in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages for 1 October 2024 to 2 December 2024 inclusive was found well-founded and succeeded. Remedy was deferred for submissions. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay complaint under regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 for 1 October 2024 to 2 December 2024 inclusive was found well-founded and succeeded. Remedy was deferred for submissions. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract complaint in respect of notice pay was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract complaint due to late pension contributions was dismissed because the claimant opted out of the relevant pension scheme. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.