Case 6003343/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Gill v Secretary of State for Business & Trade and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 6003343/2024
- Decision date
- 14 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A. Beale KC
- Venue
- London South
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr N Gill
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant sought payment from the National Insurance Fund for redundancy pay, arrears of wages, holiday pay and notice pay after Zenlo Limited entered creditors' voluntary liquidation on 28 March 2024. The Secretary of State disputed that the claimant was an employee of Zenlo Limited within section 230 ERA 1996 and disputed the sums payable if employee status was established.
The tribunal found that, as at the date of insolvency, the claimant was an employee. It accepted that he worked a regular 40-hour, five-day week, carried out operational work as well as leadership duties, was part of the holiday rota, and was subject to some control by the company. The tribunal concluded that the employment relationship existed from 1 April 2011, when Zenlo Limited was incorporated, but found insufficient evidence that he had been an employee before that date.
On calculation, the tribunal rejected the argument that payments should be based on the national minimum wage and also rejected the claimant's proposed final-12-week calculation. It used a weekly pay figure capped at the statutory maximum of £643 and awarded four weeks' arrears of pay, 12 years' redundancy pay at 1.5 weeks per year, 12 weeks' notice pay, and 3.134 weeks' accrued holiday pay, giving a total gross award of £23,877.16.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award made as arrears of wages payable from the National Insurance Fund under sections 182 and 184 ERA 1996; the judgment did not frame this as an unlawful deduction claim. | Upheld | — | £2,572 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment awarded under section 166 ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £11,574 |
| Other | Award made for statutory notice pay from the National Insurance Fund under sections 182 and 184 ERA 1996; classified as other because the judgment did not determine a wrongful dismissal or breach of contract claim. | Upheld | — | £7,716 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued holiday pay awarded under sections 182 and 184 ERA 1996 and regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £2,015 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £23,877
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.230 ERA 1996
- Ready Mixed Concrete v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance threefold test
- Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform v Neufeld
- Clark v Clark Construction Initiatives Ltd guidance
- Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher
- Rainford v Dorset Aquatics Ltd
- s.221 ERA 1996
- Working Time Regulations 1998 regulations 13, 13A and 14
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.