Case 6003379/2024 · Employment Tribunal
A Ryder v DJ Facades (NW) Limited (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6003379/2024
- Decision date
- 11 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A Ryder
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded. It found that the respondent had deducted £950.00 from wages and ordered the respondent, DJ Facades (NW) Limited (in creditors' voluntary liquidation), to pay that gross sum to the claimant, A Ryder. The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any tax and National Insurance on the amount awarded.
The written record was approved by Employment Judge M Butler on 4 March 2025 and sent to the parties on 11 March 2025. A separate interest notice accompanied the judgment, stating the relevant decision day and the stipulated rate, but the judgment itself did not record any separate interest award in the dispositive order.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded and ordered payment of the gross sum deducted. | Upheld | — | £950 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £950
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.